Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that provides reproductive health services in the United States and internationally. In 2014, federal and state governments provided the organization with $528 million in funding (40% of its annual budget). The majority of this funding comes from Medicaid which subsidizes reproductive healthcare for low-income women. In 2014, abortions accounted for 3% of the services they provided. The majority of the other services include screening for and treating sexually transmitted diseases and infections and providing contraception.…
Read more@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@9425J2G2yrs2Y
Planned parenthood should be considered free healthcare
@heatherdvdprincess2yrs2Y
Yes. As long as funding is not used for abortions besides for rape, incest, and danger to the mother, and if it is for rape, it should not be after a certain amount of time.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Yes, with the expectation that they will not use the money for abortions and that if they do, they will have their funding taken away.
@8558FRW2yrs2Y
Yes, but it should be determined by the States whether it is used for abortions.
@92ZYZRW2yrs2Y
Yes but that funding should be used to reduce the cost of procedures for those in low income households who need it.
@92VBD9F2yrs2Y
No, because people that pay taxes have to pay for kids that are not there.
@92HLYZH2yrs2Y
Yes, but put more restrictions on people who utilize it. If you cannot practice safe sex, then you shouldn't be receiving these services endlessly.
@929DQCT2yrs2Y
Yes because sometimes it can be pretty expensive when coming to take care of a child.
@8M258QP2yrs2Y
Yes- including funding abortions and many more health services that come from planned parenthood
@8T9KVZK2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as the funding is only used for certain services
@6VFYRRC2yrs2Y
No. Although I am pro-choice, I'm not a big fan of planned parenthood.
@8YWPFSD2yrs2Y
i personally dont feel like answering this question
@8YVHZD32yrs2Y
Yes, but no funding for anything to do with gender reassignment. This issues should be handle by one's private health care providers.
@8XJYDR32yrs2Y
Yes, but only state governments
@8YJZQSK2yrs2Y
Yes, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions provide abortion counseling or referrals, advocate to decriminalize abortion, or expande abortion services
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions, provide abortion counseling or referrals, advocate for decriminalizing abortion, or expand abortion services
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but funding shouldn't be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or life-threatening situations, and only for mothers who are having financial issues. The government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations.
@8Y3YHH82yrs2Y
We need Medicare For All before we can even have this discussion in a serious way.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, keep it the at the same amount but don't cut it completely. Instead, the government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore should not be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother's life or health.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, keep it the at the same amount but don't cut it completely. Instead, the government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore, should not be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother's life or health.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it should be funded less but not by completely cutting it. The government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore, should not be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother or child's life.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, funding should be reduced but not by completely cutting it. The government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore, should not be used for abortions, unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother or child's life.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but not for anything that leads to abortion unless its rape, incest, or a threat to the child and/or mother's life. Other than that, the government should focus on funding programs rather than organizations.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but not for anything that leads to abortion unless its rape, incest, or a threat to the child and/or mother's life. Otherwise, the government should focus on funding programs rather than organizations.
Deleted2yrs2Y
indifferent on this issue
@8XVL5XG2yrs2Y
This question is very broad. There are some things I like about plant parent hood, and others I despise.
@8XQCD4Q2yrs2Y
Yes, but additional funding must be directed towards early fetal viability research to allow more children to survive outside of the womb, and therefore avoid death from abortion.
@8XHNZT62yrs2Y
yes it is a safe matter and they need to be funded
@8X8PJ242yrs2Y
yes, but only if they dont have the money for it
@6N6P5Q32yrs2Y
Yes, but only after a full audit
@8WRL5Q93yrs3Y
Absolutely not! 1. Abortion have been a decrease in the population a couple years after roe v wade. 2. Some government officials( mainly Democrat) support abortion for votes. 3 minorities are hurt first and worse to abortion. Over 330,000 African American baby’s are abort every single year.
@8RB2K9D3yrs3Y
No, protect abortion rights nation wide but let each state choose how much money is used to fund Planned Parenthood
@8W24N593yrs3Y
Yes and No there is certain things they should keep ans certain things they should do away with.
@8VMYBSV3yrs3Y
No, because there is too much controversy and no one can agree or be happy with either option. So allow them to be privately funded or funded by people as a non-profit, because plenty of people will donate to keep them serving the public and then you don't have to worry about the political disagreement getting in the way of their work.
@8VKTHY53yrs3Y
If there are more important things we can fund than fund those but if not then yes.
@887SFZP3yrs3Y
Yes, free and easy access to abortion clinics, and healthcare in general, will make it easier for women to abort their fetuses before they become developed enough that abortion would be an unethical option.
@8VDPJB33yrs3Y
I think based on how much the parents are making, should decided weather or not they get funded.
@8VC7WDN3yrs3Y
No, The government should go even further and ban any institution that murders the unborn.
@8VCMN273yrs3Y
I think yes, but no if you plan on getting an abortion
@8VC7WDN3yrs3Y
No, The government should go even farther than defunding Planned Parenthood and ban it altogether.