Truancy is intentional, unjustified, unauthorized, or illegal absence from compulsory education. Its absence is caused by students of their own free will and does not apply to excused absences. In Finland students are given detention for truancy.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
@9VK6DN8Left Alliance5mos5MO
Decriminalize, but not legalize. The education of young children is of vital importance for society to function, so compulsory education should be maintained.
@9CG92BQ2yrs2Y
Yes, but encourage school attendance.
@979YBCN2yrs2Y
Yes, but there should be a small fine for the parents/guardians
@934CBWC3yrs3Y
Yes, but states should determine the level of punishment for chronic cases
@ThomasJ4763yrs3Y
Depends on why the aren't in school.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Deleted4yrs4Y
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, it is unconstitutiona;
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends case by case why the student is not in class.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on why they weren't in school.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Ask why the child isn't in school.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on why the child wasn't in school.
@92W2BVG3yrs3Y
If the student is willingly avoid school then yes
Deleted3yrs3Y
Depends on why the child isn't at school.
Deleted3yrs3Y
It should be determined each case at a time.
@9334YP33yrs3Y
Yes, it is a matter between the truant, their parents and the school, in which the government should have no say.
@92X5HLD3yrs3Y
Yes, but I would prefer to legalize it.
@8ZY2RKD3yrs3Y
Yes but only for some cases
@93GS9ZW3yrs3Y
No, but the Government should extend breaks from school
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, as this will cause other students to become truant due to legally not being required to be in school, which can lead to job deficiency decreasing due to lack of needed skills. Students should be mandated to receive proper educations but some cases can be approached or brought about with leniency.
@9425J2G3yrs3Y
Truancy criminalized for those "skipping" - not an uncontrollable situation
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on the reason why they aren't in school.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depending on each individual case.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on why they are not in school
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends why the child is not in school
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends why the aren't at school
Deleted4yrs4Y
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on why they aren't in school.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends why said child isn't in school.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on why they aren't in school
Deleted4yrs4Y
Depends on why the child isn't in school. Case by case
Deleted4yrs4Y
Regardless, each state should decide their own implementation
Deleted3yrs3Y
Depends on why they aren't in class.
Deleted5yrs5Y
No, but there should not be jail time.
@gabehwkns4yrs4Y
Yes, but working to create a more equitable education system that can assist families in crisis should reduce truancy.
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, this will cause other students to become truant due to legally not being required to be in school, which can lead to job deficiency decreasing due to lack of needed skills.
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, this will cause other students to become truant due to legally not being required to be in school, which can lead to job deficiency decreasing due to lack of needed skills. Students should be mandated to receive proper educations but some cases can be approached or brought about with leniency.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as there is a sufficient reason for doing so.
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, this will cause other students to become truant due to legally not being required to be in school, which can lead to job deficiency decreasing due to lack of needed skills. Students should be mandated to receive proper educations, but establish federal guidelines for the investigation of absences and increase access to education in low income communities and more needs to be done to see why children are not going to school.
@558YLXV3yrs3Y
Yes. Truancy should be treated more from a social services perspective than from a legal perspective; criminalizing truancy only leads to increased legal problems and increased incarceration for low-income individuals.
@3ZX6S543yrs3Y
Yes, implement social workers help families identify the root problem.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@4M78YV63yrs3Y
Yes but be very vigilante about the consequences of the action
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@5643HNN4yrs4Y
Yes, but we still need to be invested in our childrens' success by not throwing the book at them
@4V4VGHM4yrs4Y
Yes, but only after the eighth grade.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@4XD28G74yrs4Y
Yes! School attendance should never be mandatory to the extant that criminal/civil penalties apply. People overestimate the control parents have over their children. Of course education is important and should be highly encouraged, but there is no reason for punishment as the only person it hurts is the child's future.
@8HJ8G9M4yrs4Y
I am uneducated on this issue.
@88LK76J4yrs4Y
Yes our school system is broken beyond repair
@8HDWQKS4yrs4Y
We should reform the school system through school choice, and allow parents to make educational decisions for their children.
@8P6PWZP4yrs4Y
Yes, especially when students need a mental health break.
@8R8K8WM4yrs4Y
Yes, and provide programs for students that are not committed to school.
@8P5LJL84yrs4Y
Yes as long as the student is passing
@8JP4VGF4yrs4Y
No, Students are not capable of making good decisions until they have fully matured, meaning they should stay in school and learn.
@524STTZ4yrs4Y
No, but there should be some leniencies provided for some legroom for students.
@925J4Q83yrs3Y
depends on why the student isn't going to school. If they arent going to school because they have to provide for their families, give them some way for them to go to school while they can still provide. If they aren't going because they just don't want to, make them go to school
No and parents should be held accountable for those children under 6th grade. The child should be held accountable 7th grade and above.
@8WPC6NZ3yrs3Y
do wellness checks on students who miss a lot and it is unexcused
@92JXK3J3yrs3Y
Except for truancy in which the student has done illegal activities or truancy in which the parent allows and/or ignores it, Yes, it should be decriminalized.
@8ZSXDG33yrs3Y
Depending on reasoning and if they still have access t school work to pass.
@8GYMZ3B4yrs4Y
We should reform the education system and how schools work. We need to completely redo our education system.
@8TWB9LD4yrs4Y
Some kids have jobs that require them to miss school, or have issues in their family
@9242PWT3yrs3Y
It depends on the severity.
@8PRYTBY4yrs4Y
yes, but they should be more lenient with the days they missed, and work with the student to see what if everything is ok at home.
@8R7SQ2V4yrs4Y
Decriminalize, yes. Legalize, no.
@8H4DF7B4yrs4Y
If the parent is keeping the child from school without homeschooling them then yes. But if the child is just skipping school then detention works. Also, have a team intervention approach to help the student and family deal with stresses and other factors inhibiting the attendance.
@2PR69DM4yrs4Y
Yes, but incentivize enrollment by assisting families who enroll
@5VMSTDG4yrs4Y
Regardless, it should be up to the states.
@7GLVLCC4yrs4Y
Yes, but these houses need DHS/CPS Wellness Checks and encouragement to attend and intervention when necessary
@78S5M874yrs4Y
This should be determined on a case by case basis.
@78S5M874yrs4Y
It is none of the government's business
@78S5M874yrs4Y
Yes, It is none of the government's business
@7GH4CCN3yrs3Y
No, but we should make proper education for lower income or underprivileged people more accessible.
@85QWNPG4yrs4Y
Yes, and instead contact the DHS if they have not attended school for more than 40% of the year, and after attempts to contact/agree have fallen through.
@899WSD34yrs4Y
This issue should be handled by the state governments.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, parents should have civil but not criminal responsibility for willful school absences of their child beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but hold parents civilly responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week, with fines and other penalties to be determined by local school districts.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but parents should be held responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week, with civil fines and other penalties to be determined by local school districts.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but parents should be held responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week, with civil fines and other penalties to be determined by local school districts
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, parents should only have civil responsibility for voluntary school absences of their child that last beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts
@8558FRW3yrs3Y
No, but focus on addressing the underlying issue for said truancy.
@8CV568G4yrs4Y
beginning at a certain age, children should be held accountable, not parents. it should also be taken situation by situation instead of generalized punishment.
@8CYG8KL4yrs4Y
Depending on the reason why the student is not attending school, if justified it should be regulated, the student should be receiving support if the reason is justifiable. If the reason is unjustified, then they should be given a weeks notice before they have to go back to school.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but parents should be held civilly responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but parents should be held civilly responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, hold parents civilly -not criminally -responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, hold parents civilly, not criminally, responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, hold parents civilly but not criminally responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week. Fines and other penalties should be determined by local school districts
@8DDYNS84yrs4Y
yeah, unless the kid like never shows up and is failing classes
@8DNZHRP4yrs4Y
It depends if you are sick or just skipping school
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but hold parents responsible for willful absences of their son or daughter from school beyond one week, with civil fines and other penalties to be determined by local school districts.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.