Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsimmigration13yrs ago

Should illegal immigrants have access to government-subsidized healthcare?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political theme:

Political party:

Reply

 @4NJR28Janswered…4yrs4Y

No, first citizenship, and then all the health benefits possible.

 @4M8TY2Manswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but the appropriate authorities should be notified. Additionally, there needs to be a sensible path to citizenship.

 @2PR69DManswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, almost all forms of healthcare should be free

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and always for any life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases, regardless of tax paying status

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if they pay taxes, and always for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless of their tax paying status.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes, and for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and also for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases, regardless of their tax-paying status.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and for any life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and always for any life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases, regardless of tax paying status.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes, and for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless of tax paying status

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes, and always for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless of tax paying status

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, healthcare is a human right and access to basic preventive care will lower the demand for costly emergency care

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes, but always for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and - regardless - for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and - regardless - for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and for all life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if they pay taxes and for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if they pay taxes, and for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases regardless of tax paying status

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Billion-Dollar Bust: Kamala’s Campaign Drowns in Debt After Star-Studded Spending Spree

Kamala Harris's campaign ended with at least $20 million in debt, per two sources familiar. Harris raised over $1 billion and had $118 million in the bank as of Oct. 16.Rob Flaherty, this staffer said, is currently shopping around the Kamala fundraising email list to anyone who wants it to try to raise the money back. This includes other campaigns and outside groups.Flaherty is the deputy campaign manager and reports to Jen O’Malley Dillon.“Jen blew through a billion dollars in a few months and it was all Jen’s idea to do all the concerts.” — Kamala campaign adviser told meThis source added that O’Malley Dillon did these “concerts,” like Katy Perry, Lizzo, Eminem, Bruce Springsteen et cetera at the expense of “prioritizing and spending money on social media and other campaign priorities.”Apparently a group in Georgia had to lay off 100 people because they couldn’t pay them. It’s unclear at this time if the campaign PAID the talent to perform but the cost of production for the events was “immense.”What’s more, this Kamala campaign staffer said several people who were working for the Kamala Harris for President campaign are still awaiting several overdue payments they were promised for their work. IE, they didn’t pay the staff.“People didn’t like working with her. Many people on the campaign felt like we lost because Kamala wasn’t allowed to run her campaign. They were running Joe Biden’s campaign instead of a Kamala campaign. Obnoxious and very much a gate keeper and interfering with the vice president’s people who were trying to do their job.”

▲  2611 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Hegseth Out, DeSantis In? Trump Rethinks Defense Pick

President-elect Donald Trump is considering Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as a possible replacement for Pete Hegseth, his pick to run the Pentagon, according to people familiar with the discussions, amid Republican senators’ concerns over mounting allegations about the former Fox News host’s personal life.Picking DeSantis, a 2024 GOP primary rival for the presidency, would amount to a stunning turn for Trump. But he would also find in the governor a well-known conservative with a service record who shares Trump’s—and Hegseth’s—view on culling what they see as “woke” policies in the military.Trump allies increasingly think Hegseth might not survive further scrutiny, according to people close to the president-elect’s team, which considers the next 48 hours to be crucial to his fate.DeSantis, who served as a Navy lawyer in Iraq and the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, was on an earlier list of potential defense-secretary candidates that transition officials presented to the president. Trump ultimately went with Hegseth. But as Hegseth’s nomination has faltered, that list has been revived and DeSantis is again among the choices Trump is considering, the people said.The discussions are in their early stages, one of the people said, adding that Trump has floated DeSantis’s name in casual conversations with guests at Mar-a-Lago, his private Florida club.Trump could decide not to choose DeSantis and select another replacement, if Hegseth’s nomination falls apart, the people said. Another potential defense-secretary candidate who has been discussed by Trump allies, according to people familiar with the matter, is Elbridge Colby, a former Pentagon official and ally of Vice President-elect JD Vance. Trump is also considering Sen. Joni Ernst (R., Iowa) for the job, some of the people said.DeSantis was once seen as an acolyte of Trump but his decision to challenge the former president in the 2024 GOP primary began a conflict between them, with Trump casting DeSantis as disloyal. Trump easily prevailed in the primary and friends of the two have worked to repair the relationship.

▲  279 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Border Bombshell: 8 Million New Arrivals Under Biden

The immigration surge of the past few years has been the largest in U.S. history, surpassing the great immigration boom of the late 1800s and early 1900s, according to a New York Times analysis of government data.Annual net migration — the number of people coming to the country minus the number leaving — averaged 2.4 million people from 2021 to 2023, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Total net migration during the Biden administration is likely to exceed eight million people.That’s a faster pace of arrivals than during any other period on record, including the peak years of Ellis Island traffic, when millions of Europeans came to the United States. Even after taking into account today’s larger U.S. population, the recent surge is the most rapid since at least 1850.The numbers in the Times analysis include both legal and illegal immigration. About 60 percent of immigrants who have entered the country since 2021 have done so without legal authorization, according to a Goldman Sachs report based on government data.The combined increases of legal and illegal immigration have caused the share of the U.S. population born in another country to reach a new high, 15.2 percent in 2023, up from 13.6 percent in 2020. The previous high was 14.8 percent, in 1890.Several factors caused the surge, starting with President Biden’s welcoming immigration policy during his first three years in office. Offended by Donald J. Trump’s harsh policies — including the separation of families at the border — Mr. Biden and other Democrats promised a different approach. “We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee, and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come,’” Mr. Biden said during his 2020 presidential campaign.After taking office, his administration loosened the rules on asylum and other immigration policies, making it easier for people to enter the United States. Some have received temporary legal status while their cases wend through backlogged immigration courts. Others have remained without legal permission.

▲  1512 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  2019 replies5 agree1 disagree6