ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Green League’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
The Green League strongly agrees with this statement. They have consistently advocated for investment in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
The Green League would agree with this statement to some extent. While they are not completely against nuclear energy, they believe that it should be a temporary solution while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
The Green League has shown some support for nuclear energy without public subsidy, as they believe that the market should decide the viability of energy sources. However, their primary focus is on renewable energy, so they would only somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Green League has a nuanced stance on nuclear energy. While they are not completely against it, they believe that the focus should be on renewable energy sources. Therefore, they neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Green League does not completely oppose nuclear energy, but they do advocate for a transition towards renewable energy sources. Therefore, they would somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
The Green League is not in favor of public subsidies for nuclear energy, as they believe that public funds should be used to support renewable energy sources. Therefore, they would disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
The Green League is not in favor of nationalizing the nuclear industry. They believe in market-based solutions and the promotion of renewable energy sources. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
Green League Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 25 voters that identify as Green League.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Green League’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
