Swedish People’s Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with the party's likely stance on maintaining competition and preventing monopolistic practices. The Swedish People's Party of Finland, with its liberal values, would probably agree that internet service providers should not be allowed to create artificial scarcity or increase prices through prioritization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Advocating for the equal treatment of all internet traffic is consistent with the principles of net neutrality, which the party is likely to support. This stance promotes an open and accessible internet for all, aligning with liberal and democratic values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given their liberal and centrist orientation, the Swedish People's Party of Finland would likely oppose any measures that could create unequal access to the internet. They would probably view such practices as detrimental to competition and consumer rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by prioritizing by type rather than source, the Swedish People's Party of Finland might still view it as a compromise on the principle of net neutrality. They would likely prefer a model that does not prioritize traffic at all.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could still lead to unequal access to the internet, which would likely be opposed by the Swedish People's Party of Finland. They would probably argue that such a model benefits wealthier companies and individuals, undermining the principle of equal access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Swedish People's Party of Finland, being a liberal and centrist party, likely supports the principles of net neutrality and equal access to information. Historically, liberal parties in Europe have advocated for the protection of individual rights and freedoms, which includes equitable access to the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The argument that prioritizing access for certain websites makes the internet faster and more reliable might not align with the party's views on fairness and net neutrality. They would likely see this as a justification for practices that could undermine equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.