Swedish People’s Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

SFP has shown support for environmental sustainability and measures that combat climate change. Increasing spending on environmentally friendly public transportation solutions aligns with their commitment to environmental issues and sustainable development, making this a likely favorable stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Swedish People's Party of Finland (SFP) generally supports initiatives that improve the quality of life for its constituents, including investments in public infrastructure and services. However, their support for increased spending on public transportation would likely be balanced with considerations for fiscal responsibility and the broader context of government spending priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and provide more free public transportation

While SFP supports improving public transportation and making it more accessible, the proposal for more free public transportation would need to be evaluated in the context of fiscal sustainability and overall budget priorities. They would likely support measures that increase accessibility but would be cautious about the financial implications of making more services free. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

SFP might be open to maintaining current spending levels if they believe that the existing budget is being used efficiently and effectively. However, their overall inclination towards improving and expanding public services suggests a preference for strategic increases in spending rather than mere satisfaction with the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we have more important issues that need funding

While SFP recognizes the importance of addressing various societal issues, they also understand the critical role of public transportation in enhancing mobility, reducing traffic congestion, and contributing to environmental goals. Thus, they would likely disagree with the notion that other issues should always take precedence over public transportation funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

SFP is not typically opposed to public spending on essential services like transportation, especially if it can be demonstrated that such spending brings broad societal benefits. Therefore, a flat opposition to increased spending does not align well with their general policy stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should reduce current spending

Reducing current spending on public transportation would likely be at odds with SFP's goals of improving public services and infrastructure, especially given their focus on enhancing quality of life and environmental sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should privatize more public transportation services

SFP's centrist and liberal stance makes them more inclined to support public solutions for essential services like transportation, rather than pushing for privatization. Their policies generally emphasize the importance of accessibility and sustainability over privatization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.