32% Yes |
68% No |
17% Yes |
62% No |
11% Yes, but only for low-income pensioners |
4% No, not until we decrease our national debt |
2% Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
2% No, they should be reduced |
1% Yes, for government workers but not for politicians |
See how support for each position on “Government Pensions” has changed over time for 171 Finland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Government Pensions” has changed over time for 171 Finland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Finland users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Explore other topics that are important to Finland voters.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y
Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…