61% Yes |
39% No |
52% Yes |
34% No |
5% Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
3% No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
4% Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
1% No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens |
See how support for each position on “Video Surveillance” has changed over time for 726 Finland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Video Surveillance” has changed over time for 726 Finland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Finland users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@93XPRP52yrs2Y
Yes, with clear designation and reasoning on why video surveillance is needed there
Explore other topics that are important to Finland voters.
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y
Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…