72%
Yes
28%
No
62%
Yes
24%
No
7%
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
4%
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
1%
Yes, and nationalize the industry
1%
Yes, but with public subsidy
1%
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 2k Finland voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 2k Finland voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Finland users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9B5GHBBanswered…1yr1Y

While cleaner alternatives would be preferred, tightly regulated nuclear energy is acceptable

 @8T3R34Vanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only nuclear fusion. Nuclear fission leaves radioactive waste and is much more dangerous. Fusion is the future.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Finland voters.