@ISIDEWITHPitanjaVanjska politikaprije 7 godina

Ukoliko naša zemlja ostaje u NATO-u?

Hoće li Finska ostati u NATO-u?

Sjevernoatlantski savez je međuvladina vojni savez na temelju Sjevernoatlantskog ugovora koji je potpisan 4. travnja 1949. To je politički i vojni savez zemalja članica iz Europe i Sjeverne Amerike koji se slažu pružiti vojnu i ekonomsku sigurnost za svaku druge. NATO čini sve njegove odluke konsenzusom i svake zemlje članice, bez obzira koliko veliki ili mali, ima jednaku reći.

66%
Da
34%
Nema
59%
Da
30%
Nema
8%
Da, ali je NATO trebao više usredotočiti na borbu protiv terorizma strategija
3%
Ne, to je zastario i treba ukinuti
1%
Ne, ne dok druge zemlje povećati svoje financijske doprinose

Povijesni Rezultati

Pogledajte kako se podrška svakom stajalištu o "NATO” tijekom vremena promijenila za 223 Finska glasača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Povijesna Važnost

Pogledajte kako se važnost "NATO” promijenila tijekom vremena za 223 Finska birača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Najnovije Vijesti

Budite u tijeku s najnovijim člancima o "NATO” koji se često ažuriraju.

 @ISIDEWITH podneseno…2 dana2D

NATO Chief Criticizes Slow Arms Deliveries to Ukraine, Citing Advantage to Russia

In a series of pointed remarks, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has criticized member countries for their sluggish pace in delivering promised military aid to Ukraine. This delay, according to Stoltenberg, has inadvertently aided Russia by allowing it to press its advantage against Ukrainian forces, who are in dire need of the promised support. The criticism comes at a critical juncture in the conflict, highlighting the challenges within the alliance in coordinating and executing aid commitments efficiently.The issue of slow arms deliveries has been a contentious one, with Ukraine's allies acknowledging the impact of these delays on the battlefield. The failure to deliver in a timely manner has not only emboldened Russian forces but has also put Ukrainian troops at a significant disadvantage, struggling to hold their ground with depleted resources. This situation underscores the logistical and bureaucratic hurdles that can hamper the effectiveness of international support in times of crisis.Stoltenberg's comments have sparked a broader conversation about the responsibilities of NATO member countries in supporting allies under threat. The criticism aims to galvanize member states into action, urging them to fulfill their commitments more swiftly. The alliance's unity and the credibility of its support mechanisms are at stake, with the effectiveness of collective defense measures under scrutiny.The ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the role of NATO in supporting the country's defense efforts have been focal points of international attention. The alliance's ability to provide timely and effective aid is crucial not only for Ukraine's immediate defense needs but also for the broader message it sends to adversaries about NATO's resolve and solidarity.As the situation develops, the international community watches closely to see how NATO member countries respond to Stoltenberg's call to action. The hope is that this criticism will lead to a more coordinated and timely delivery of military aid to Ukraine, ultimately helping to balance the scales in a conflict that has drawn widespread concern for its humanitarian and geopolitical implications.

 @ISIDEWITH podneseno…2 dana2D

Turkey Throws Support Behind Rutte for NATO's Top Job

In a significant move that could shape the future leadership of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Turkey has officially announced its support for Mark Rutte, the outgoing Dutch Prime Minister, to become the alliance's next secretary-general. This endorsement from Turkey, a key NATO member, marks a pivotal moment in the selection process for the organization's new leader. The backing of Rutte by Ankara is seen as a crucial step in securing his position at the helm of NATO, an alliance that has been at the forefront of defense and security in the Euro-Atlantic area for over seven decades.Turkey's support is not just a mere formality; it is a significant endorsement that could sway other member states in Rutte's favor. As NATO members deliberate on who should lead the organization into a future fraught with security challenges, including rising tensions with Russia and the ongoing need for military modernization, the backing of a prominent member like Turkey is invaluable. The Turkish official's announcement underscores Ankara's role as a key player in NATO's dynamics and its influence over pivotal decisions within the alliance.Mark Rutte's candidacy comes at a time when NATO is navigating complex geopolitical landscapes, making the leadership role more crucial than ever. With his extensive experience in politics and governance, Rutte is viewed by many as a strong candidate capable of steering the alliance through these challenging times. His leadership could focus on enhancing NATO's unity, ensuring the alliance remains responsive to the evolving security environment, and furthering the organization's strategic objectives.The support from Turkey also highlights the intricate diplomatic relationships within NATO, showcasing how member states' endorsements can significantly impact leadership decisions. As the process of selecting the next secretary-general progresses, the alliance's members will weigh various factors, including candidates' leadership qualities, their vision for NATO's future, and their ability to navigate the alliance's complex political landscape.As NATO prepares for a new chapter under potentially new leadership, the support for Rutte by Turkey signals a moment of unity and strategic alignment among member states. It reflects the collective endeavor to strengthen the alliance's leadership and ensure NATO remains a pivotal force for peace and security in the international arena.