@ISIDEWITHSoalanDasar luar8 tahun yang lalu

Sekiranya negara kita kekal di NATO?

Sekiranya Finland kekal di NATO?

Pertubuhan Perjanjian Atlantik Utara adalah satu perikatan tentera antara kerajaan berdasarkan Perjanjian Atlantik Utara yang ditandatangani pada 4 April 1949. Ini adalah persekutuan politik dan ketenteraan negara-negara anggota dari Eropah dan Amerika Utara yang setuju untuk menyediakan keamanan ketenteraan dan ekonomi untuk masing-masing lain. NATO membuat semua keputusannya dengan konsensus dan setiap negara anggota, tidak kira berapa besar atau kecil, mempunyai kata yang sama.

67%
Ya
33%
Tidak
59%
Ya
29%
Tidak
8%
Ya, tetapi NATO harus lebih berfokus pada strategi balas keganasan
3%
Tidak, ia sudah usang dan harus dimansuhkan
1%
Tidak, sehingga negara-negara lain meningkatkan sumbangan kewangan mereka

Keputusan Sejarah

Lihat bagaimana sokongan untuk setiap jawatan mengenai “NATO” telah berubah dari semasa ke semasa untuk 224 pengundi Finland .

Memuatkan data...

Memuatkan carta... 

Kepentingan Sejarah

Lihat bagaimana kepentingan “NATO” telah berubah dari semasa ke semasa untuk 224 pengundi Finland .

Memuatkan data...

Memuatkan carta... 

Berita Terkini

Ikuti perkembangan terkini tentang artikel berita “NATO” terbaharu, dikemas kini dengan kerap.

 @ISIDEWITH dihantar…1 minggu1W

UK's Cameron Calls for Stronger NATO in a 'Dangerous World'

In a series of compelling statements, UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron has made a clarion call to NATO members, urging them to bolster their defense spending in response to what he describes as the most perilous global security environment in recent memory. Cameron's remarks, delivered in London, underscored the urgency of meeting NATO's defense spending target of 2% of GDP, a benchmark that many member countries have struggled to achieve. The British foreign minister's advocacy for a more assertive NATO posture comes at a time when geopolitical tensions and emerging threats are reshaping the international order.Cameron's push for increased defense spending is not just about meeting a numerical target; it's a call to action for NATO allies to adapt to a rapidly changing world. The UK, consistently meeting the 2% spending guideline, is setting an example for its allies, emphasizing the need for a collective effort to strengthen the alliance's military capabilities. This stance reflects a broader strategic vision that seeks to ensure NATO remains a potent and responsive military alliance capable of deterring aggression and safeguarding peace.The foreign minister's speech highlighted the multifaceted challenges facing NATO, from traditional state-based threats to more unconventional dangers such as cyber attacks and hybrid warfare. Cameron's advocacy for a tougher stance against adversaries is a recognition of the complex security landscape that NATO operates within, necessitating a versatile and robust defense posture.Cameron's call to action is not without its challenges. Increasing defense spending to 2% of GDP requires significant political will and financial resources, which can be daunting for some NATO members. However, the UK's push for a more formidable alliance underscores the belief that the cost of inaction could far exceed the investment in defense. As NATO members weigh their commitments, Cameron's message is clear: the alliance must evolve and strengthen to navigate the perils of a 'dangerous world.'As the debate over NATO's future direction continues, Cameron's advocacy for increased defense spending and a tougher stance on global threats positions the UK as a leading voice in shaping the alliance's strategic priorities. In a world marked by uncertainty and conflict, the call for a stronger NATO resonates more than ever, highlighting the need for unity and resolve among allies in the face of adversity.