@ISIDEWITHSoalanMasalah sosial12 tahun yang lalu

Apakah pendirian anda tentang pengguguran?

Pengguguran adalah prosedur perubatan yang mengakibatkan penamatan kehamilan manusia dan kematian janin. Pengguguran diharamkan di 30 negeri sehingga Keputusan Mahkamah Agung 1973 Roe v Wade. Keputusan itu menjadikan undang-undang pengguguran undang-undang di semua 50 negeri tetapi memberi mereka kuasa pengawalseliaan apabila pengguguran boleh dilakukan semasa kehamilan. Pada masa ini, semua negeri mesti membenarkan pengguguran awal pada kehamilan tetapi boleh mengharamkannya pada trimester kemudian.

78%
Pro-pilihan
22%
Pro-life
67%
Pro-pilihan
15%
Pro-life
6%
Pro-pilihan, dan menyediakan kawalan kelahiran, pendidikan seks, dan lebih banyak perkhidmatan sosial akan membantu mengurangkan bilangan pengguguran
8%
Pro-life, tetapi membenarkan dalam kes rogol, incest, atau bahaya kepada ibu atau anak
3%
Pro-pilihan, tetapi larangan selepas tiga bulan pertama
0%
Pro-life, dan saya juga menentang pengguguran untuk mangsa rogol dan incest
1%
Pro-pilihan, saya tidak bersetuju tetapi kerajaan tidak mempunyai hak untuk melarangnya

Keputusan Sejarah

Lihat bagaimana sokongan untuk setiap jawatan mengenai “Pengguguran” telah berubah dari semasa ke semasa untuk 957 pengundi Finland .

Memuatkan data...

Memuatkan carta... 

Kepentingan Sejarah

Lihat bagaimana kepentingan “Pengguguran” telah berubah dari semasa ke semasa untuk 957 pengundi Finland .

Memuatkan data...

Memuatkan carta... 

Jawapan Popular Lain

Jawapan unik daripada pengguna Finland yang pandangannya melangkaui pilihan yang disediakan.

Berita Terkini

Ikuti perkembangan terkini tentang artikel berita “Pengguguran” terbaharu, dikemas kini dengan kerap.

 @ISIDEWITH dihantar…17jam17H

Obama Criticizes Trump's Seriousness and Influence, Sparking Political Debate

In a series of recent public statements and interviews, former President Barack Obama has openly criticized Donald Trump, highlighting a growing political discourse surrounding the former president's influence and legacy. Obama, speaking on a popular podcast, remarked that Trump was 'not considered a serious guy' in New York, a statement that underscores the deep divisions between the political ideologies represented by both figures. This comment has sparked a wider conversation about Trump's role in current political dynamics, especially as discussions about policy, leadership style, and the future direction of the United States continue to dominate public discourse.The debate extends beyond personal criticisms, touching on significant issues such as abortion rights, racial tensions, and economic policies. Trump's stance on abortion has recently come under scrutiny, with concerns about the potential for increased monitoring of women's pregnancies and prosecutions related to abortion in Republican-led states. Meanwhile, Trump has voiced concerns about what he perceives as 'anti-white feeling' in the country, a statement that has added fuel to ongoing discussions about race relations in America.Comparisons between the Trump and Biden administrations are also at the forefront of these discussions, with commentators like Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist highlighting the differences in governance and public sentiment during their respective terms. The economic challenges faced by many Americans under the current administration have led to nostalgia for the Trump presidency among some voters, despite the controversies that marked his time in office.The legal challenges facing Trump, including a hush money trial where his former lawyer Michael Cohen is a key witness, further complicate the former president's political legacy. Cohen's decision to discuss the trial on social media platforms like TikTok has raised questions about the impact of such actions on legal proceedings and public perception.As these debates unfold, the contrasting views of Obama and Trump on leadership, policy, and the direction of the country highlight the ongoing struggle within American politics to define its future path. The discourse surrounding these two figures, both of whom continue to wield significant influence, reflects the broader political and ideological divides shaping the United States today.

 @ISIDEWITH dihantar…20jam20H

Trump's Controversial Stance on Deportations and Election Violence Sparks Debate

In a series of recent interviews and public statements, former President Donald Trump has reignited controversy with his bold declarations on immigration and the potential for political violence surrounding the upcoming elections. Trump's unwavering commitment to mass deportations, utilizing the military if necessary, has stirred a significant reaction both domestically and internationally. His refusal to dismiss the possibility of political violence if the election results do not favor him has further intensified the discourse around the stability of democratic processes in the United States.Trump's approach to immigration, particularly his advocacy for the use of harsh deportation tools and the construction of a border wall, has found a resonance among a segment of the American population. Recent polls indicate a shift in public opinion, with a growing number of Americans now supporting more stringent measures against illegal immigration. This change reflects a broader trend of hardening attitudes towards immigration policy, a contentious issue that has divided communities and influenced political landscapes across the globe.The former president's comments have not only sparked debate within the United States but have also drawn criticism from international observers. Concerns about the implications of Trump's statements for democratic norms and the rule of law are being raised, highlighting the global repercussions of political rhetoric that threatens violence in response to electoral defeat.Amidst this controversy, the European Union (EU) faces its own challenges with immigration and open borders, with some critics arguing that the bloc's leadership is out of touch with the realities of its constituents. The rise of populist movements and the backlash against elite consensus on immigration policy underscore a widespread discontent that mirrors the sentiments propelling Trump's agenda.As the world watches closely, the unfolding situation raises pressing questions about the future of immigration policy, the integrity of electoral processes, and the resilience of democratic institutions in the face of divisive politics. Trump's stance, while controversial, has undeniably catalyzed a broader conversation on these critical issues, signaling a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over national identity, security, and the principles of democracy.

Soalan Popular Lain

Terokai topik lain yang penting kepada pengundi Finland .