Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
R>R Personal answerWhile it is inhumane, it is more inhumane to let someone suffer in the hellish abyss that is terminal mental illness, if there is a chance they can be saved, then we should try for a certain amount of time, the amount of time depends on the illness, but if it's impossible, then don't let them suffer. |
社会 › 堕胎
R>R Personal answerDepends on the way they got impregnated, rape victims and incest are some examples, but if its for something like "I don't like my boyfriend, so I'm going to take away his baby" then no. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
R>R Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
R>R Personal answer是的,只要他们回到他们的国家是安全的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
R>R Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
R>R Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
R>R Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 公民考试
R>R Personal answerYes, but the test should be where you teach them basic English, make sure they know their rights, morals, and what common sense in America is. |
交通运输 › 公共交通
R>R Personal answer是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案 |
移民 › 技术移民
R>R Personal answer增长 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
R>R Personal answerDepending on how big their hustle was, and if people died and how many if people did die. |
外交政策 › 以色列
R>R Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 经济刺激
R>R Personal answerYes, but only depending on how many people are in the household, and the current rate should be reduced. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
R>R Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
R>R Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
R>R Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
R>R Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
R>R Personal answer减少 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
R>R Personal answerYes, until they have enough to live for a few months and are able to get a stable income job. |
移民 › 移民同化
R>R Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
R>R Personal answerNo, not until we fix airport, and border security and checks |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
R>R Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
R>R Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
R>R Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 公司税
R>R Personal answer提升 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
R>R Personal answer减少 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
R>R Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
经济 › 税
R>R Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
R>R Personal answerYes but slowly rehabilitate them at the same time to reduce overall usage. |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
R>R Personal answerNo, but anyone who does it needs to accept Americans will be Americans, if they are in a neighbor where "Karens" and "Daves" are then those people will probably have some problems with them. If those people do get violent, then they have the right to defend themselves and call the police no questions asked, but they have understand the consequences. |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
R>R Personal answerOnly if they have been given treatment and are checked for drugs 2 times every month for the next 2 years. |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
R>R Personal answer不 |
经济 › 国内工作
R>R Personal answer是的,并大幅增加外包业务的税费和进口关税 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
R>R Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
R>R Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
R>R Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
R>R Personal answer是的 |
教育 › School Truancy
R>R Personal answerDepending on the reason why the student is not attending school, if justified it should be regulated, the student should be receiving support if the reason is justifiable. If the reason is unjustified, then they should be given a weeks notice before they have to go back to school. |
经济 › State Ownership
R>R Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.