Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 网路中立性
Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
社会 › 安乐死
Personal answer是,但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能 |
移民 › 移民同化
Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
Personal answer不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
移民 › 公民考试
Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Personal answerno, but require them to label information in 3 terms. Fact, opinion, and report. All "fact" stories, must have 3 sources to refer to with up to 2% of descriptive adjectives allowed. All "report" stories are to be understood as to be too new to cite sources and with the disclaimer that it may or may not be untrue. All opinion pieces must be pro dominantly labeled as such. This includes all media - paper, video, and live events. This is for audience reference ONLY!! |
医保 › 精神健康
Personal answer不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
Personal answer减少 |
移民 › 技术移民
Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
经济 › 税
Personal answer改革为单一税制 |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answerYes and no. There should be a large pool of candidates to choose from in a primary and a smaller pool for the election. Funds should be equal so advertising would be equal as well. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
Personal answer增长 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
医保 › 安全港
Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 经济刺激
Personal answer不,政府在经济衰退期间应该大幅减少开支 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Personal answerno, but huge entities should be restricted in donating to political candidates. |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 公司税
Personal answer大型跨国企业有所增加而小企业低一些 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 以色列
Personal answer我们应该给予以色列和巴勒斯坦同样的支持。 |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
Personal answerNo, but they should encourage companies to do so. |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
经济 › State Ownership
Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
教育 › School Truancy
Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.