Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 网路中立性
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
TJ>TJ Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
社会 › 安乐死
TJ>TJ Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › 移民同化
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
TJ>TJ Personal answerFacts only and a warning for fake news. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
移民 › 公民考试
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, but it should be based on how the country functions. |
医保 › 精神健康
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
TJ>TJ Personal answerOnly grassroots donations |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, make safe zones in their countries so they don't destroy ours. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
外交政策 › 外国援助
TJ>TJ Personal answer对藏匿或宣扬恐怖主义的国家减少并拒绝提供援助 |
移民 › 技术移民
TJ>TJ Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, everyone that works should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing. |
社会 › 死刑
TJ>TJ Personal answerSort of. I do not like the idea that the government has the capability to execute someone but I do believe that we should bring back public executions for those who have been proven as being a rapist, anything against animals, gruesome attacks, and execute those who have manipulated another. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
TJ>TJ Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
经济 › 税
TJ>TJ Personal answerRemove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations and make sure everyone pays their fair share. |
医保 › World Health Organization
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
TJ>TJ Personal answerFacts only and a warning for fake news |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, but we should help them get jobs. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
外交政策 › 军费支出
TJ>TJ Personal answer减少 |
社会 › Hate Speech
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
TJ>TJ Personal answerReform the system so there will never be overcrowding. |
环境 › Animal Testing
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, use voluntary humans instead. |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
TJ>TJ Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
经济 › 公司税
TJ>TJ Personal answer大型跨国企业有所增加而小企业低一些 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
外交政策 › 以色列
TJ>TJ Personal answer不,削减所有的支持和帮助 |
社会 › Gender Transition
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents |
教育 › School Truancy
TJ>TJ Personal answerDepends |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.