Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Science › Nuclear Energy
Personal answerYes, but the communities involved should have final say. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
Personal answerNo, Provinces and Regions, Even Municipalities, would be best dealing with this issue. Different places, different problems. |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
Personal answerMore |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
Personal answerYes |
Social › Euthanasia
Personal answerNot assisted, if they want to do it themselves, up to them. Leave some cleanup money behind. |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
Personal answerAll Federal Laws On Drugs as well as Regulations should be ended unless pertaining to Trade. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
Personal answerNo, this is a local matter. |
Crime › Private Prisons
Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
Personal answerNo, and all Espionage (CSIS, CSE, et al...) should be banned. |
Healthcare › Mental Health
Personal answerNot Federally. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Social › Abortion
Personal answerPro-Life, Life beginning at the uterine wall when cell growth starts. So (Plan B) the morning after pill is ideal for promoting. The Government should not fund any abortion or activism (of any kind). |
Elections › Campaign Finance
Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answerNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Social › Gay Marriage
Personal answerTake the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision |
Healthcare › Marijuana
Personal answerI believe in ending all federal drug laws not related to trade. |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answerNo |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
Personal answerNo, unless they are a sitting incumbent. |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
Personal answerAbolish Foreign Aid |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
Personal answerMaintain, unless there is a huge need for specific jobs to be filled. |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
Personal answerNo |
Social › Women in Combat
Personal answerNo, it's dishonorable to hide behind a woman. |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
Personal answerGive them "Time Served," under a No Recrimination Act, as long as information proves true and leads to convictions. Anyone falsely accused has rights.. Don't treat them like heroes, unless they had nothing to do with what they witnessed. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
Personal answerYes, if there is shown to be a solid extended family with good opposite sex active role models. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Taxes
Personal answerNo, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
Personal answerYes |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
Personal answerNo, I am starting to side with raising it. |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
Personal answerYes, fully labelled like advertising and in controlled growing so there is no accidental cross breading on the lands of others. |
Crime › Defunding the Police
Personal answerNo, the Federal Government shouldn't fund any of it. Personally: Eliminate the Patrol, Beat, Vice, and Car 87/Wellness Check cops. |
Social › Hate Speech
Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
Personal answerDecrease, end all foreign military activity abroad. |
Social › Niqāb
Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
Personal answerNo, it's a dangerous mixed message and highly controlling. |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
Personal answerYes, if they did their full time. Not if paroled or conditionally released. |
the Environment › Animal Testing
Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
Personal answerYes, pardon non-violent criminals for those crimes alone fully (not if they have others attached that are violent). |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
Personal answer1 year health screening and training, to see if they like it. No combat or tours. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
Personal answerYes, unless they didn't finish their full term in prison but through Conditional and Parole release. |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
Personal answerNo, the Government should just get out of the way of the private sector. In most cases. |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
Personal answerOnly Google has the problem of running a search and platform, the rest do not. |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
Personal answerRestructure Revenue Sourcing, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. Even look at crowd funding on a voluntary level. |
Social › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerThe Government shouldn't fund sports events. Private Leagues, Player Associations and Sports organizations should be allowed to set their own rules and contracts in this manner. Individual Sportsmen/women as well. |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Fracking
Personal answerYes, but the say should be the communities effected by the industries. |
the Economy › Government Spending
Personal answerYes, most of Federal Government spending is for Civil Servants to redistribute funds to other high level civil servants, trickling it down to nothing and using strings attached to control local and provincial Government affairs. |
Social › Gender Transition
Personal answerNo, surgery, hormones or puberty blocker. If you let your kid boy wear a dress or something and identify, fine. All have a right to mature naturally. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
Personal answerOnly in freer part of the world. Not communist or fascist states. |
the Economy › Bonus Cap
Personal answerNo, but no one should bail them out or offer corporate welfare to make it easy to help pay them more. |
the Economy › Welfare
Personal answerIt's a provincial issue. On principle, maybe there should be a limitation on the amount of years, perhaps an end to future generations and immigrants using it. Also separating Disability to the Medical System, not conflating it with welfare. |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
Personal answerRestructure Revenue Sourcing, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. Even look at crowd funding on a voluntary level.` |
the Economy › Labor Unions
Personal answerCentrally controlled monopolistic unions have hurt. Old fashioned guilds with apprenticeships and a contracted minimum, but not maximum wage should be fine. Civil Service unions do hurt things. |
the Economy › Government Pensions
Personal answerLink to inflation/deflation. |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked most important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked least important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.